Volume 39, Issue 1 (1-2025)
Med J Islam Repub Iran 2025 |
Back to browse issues page
Yasser Ahmed Abdelaziz El Kerdasy 
, Ibrahim Fadl Mahmoud , Neazy Abdmokhles Abdelmottaleb , Mahmoud Gaballah Montasser Ali , Mahmoud Helmy Elsaied
, Ibrahim Fadl Mahmoud , Neazy Abdmokhles Abdelmottaleb , Mahmoud Gaballah Montasser Ali , Mahmoud Helmy Elsaied
Department of Forensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology, Damietta Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Damietta; Msc Medical Education, Alexandria University, Egypt , M.h973@azhar.edu.eg
Abstract: (133 Views)
Background: Postoperative delirium (POD) in elderly subjects is an important health issue as it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Anesthetic agents are associated factors for the development of POD. However, the results of previous studies are heterogeneous. The current work aimed to determine the incidence and associated factors of POD after sevoflurane or propofol general anesthesia.
Methods: This was a retrospective study, where data were collected from the medical records of 200 subjects scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. One hundred received sevoflurane, and the other 100 received propofol. The collected data included patient characteristics and preoperative and operative data. In addition, POD and any complications developed after surgery are also included. Mean and standard deviation were used to summarize quantitative variables, while frequency and percentages were used to express categorical data. The independent sample’s student test was used to compare two means, and Chi-Square was used to calculate associations between categorical parameters. Risk estimate was determined by calculation of odds ratios. P value<0.05 was considered significant.
Results: Operative time was significantly shorter in sevoflurane than in propofol groups (249.91±45.41 vs 264.60±45.78 minutes, respectively). Otherwise, no significant differences were recorded for preoperative and operative data. The incidence of POD was significantly higher after propofol than sevoflurane (30.0% vs 14.0%). The POD was significantly associated with higher ASA-class physical status, diabetes mellitus, and type of anesthetic agent. ASA-III was 34.1% and 10.3% in patients with delirium than without delirium. Diabetes recorded 65.9% for the group with delirium compared to 10.3% for those without delirium.
Conclusion: POD was higher after propofol than sevoflurane anesthesia. It is associated with ASA physical status, diabetes, and the type of anesthetic agent used.
Methods: This was a retrospective study, where data were collected from the medical records of 200 subjects scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. One hundred received sevoflurane, and the other 100 received propofol. The collected data included patient characteristics and preoperative and operative data. In addition, POD and any complications developed after surgery are also included. Mean and standard deviation were used to summarize quantitative variables, while frequency and percentages were used to express categorical data. The independent sample’s student test was used to compare two means, and Chi-Square was used to calculate associations between categorical parameters. Risk estimate was determined by calculation of odds ratios. P value<0.05 was considered significant.
Results: Operative time was significantly shorter in sevoflurane than in propofol groups (249.91±45.41 vs 264.60±45.78 minutes, respectively). Otherwise, no significant differences were recorded for preoperative and operative data. The incidence of POD was significantly higher after propofol than sevoflurane (30.0% vs 14.0%). The POD was significantly associated with higher ASA-class physical status, diabetes mellitus, and type of anesthetic agent. ASA-III was 34.1% and 10.3% in patients with delirium than without delirium. Diabetes recorded 65.9% for the group with delirium compared to 10.3% for those without delirium.
Conclusion: POD was higher after propofol than sevoflurane anesthesia. It is associated with ASA physical status, diabetes, and the type of anesthetic agent used.
Type of Study: Original Research |
Subject:
Anesthesia
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |