<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic Of Iran</title>
<title_fa>مجله پزشکی جمهوری اسلامی ایران</title_fa>
<short_title>Med J Islam Repub Iran</short_title>
<subject>Medical Sciences</subject>
<web_url>http://mjiri.iums.ac.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>2</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>journal2</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>1016-1430</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2251-6840</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.18869/mjiri</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>8888</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1401</year>
	<month>11</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2023</year>
	<month>2</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>37</volume>
<number>1</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Evaluation of Episiotomy Characteristics of EPISCISSORS–60 Scissors Compared with Mayo Scissors: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial</title>
	<subject_fa>Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics</subject_fa>
	<subject>Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics</subject>
	<content_type_fa>Original Research</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Original Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:13pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-justify:kashida&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-kashida:0%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-autospace:none&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&amp;quot;Times New Roman&amp;quot;,serif&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:italic&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:normal&quot;&gt;Background: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:normal&quot;&gt;It seems that angled scissors may be able to minimize the occurrence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) during vaginal delivery by correcting the angle of the episiotomy incision.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:13pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-justify:kashida&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-kashida:0%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-autospace:none&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&amp;quot;Times New Roman&amp;quot;,serif&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:italic&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:normal&quot;&gt;For this purpose, this study aimed to evaluate the episiotomy characteristics of EPISCISSORS&amp;ndash;60 scissors compared with Mayo scissors.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:13pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-justify:kashida&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-kashida:0%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-autospace:none&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&amp;quot;Times New Roman&amp;quot;,serif&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:italic&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:normal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; In this single-blind clinical trial study, 64 pregnant women candidates for natural childbirth were included; 32 women underwent episiotomy with Mayo scissors and 32 underwent episiotomy with the EPISCISSORS&amp;ndash;60 instrument. Then, post-suturing angle, incision length, episiotomy, postpartum pain, bleeding volume, and the incidence of OASIS and dyspareunia were assessed. The collected data were analyzed by independent sample t test, chi-square test, and the Fisher exact test.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:13pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-justify:kashida&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-kashida:0%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-autospace:none&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&amp;quot;Times New Roman&amp;quot;,serif&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:italic&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:normal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;b&gt;Results: &lt;/b&gt;Episiotomy incision length in the EPISCISSORS&amp;ndash;60 group with a mean of 4.75 &amp;plusmn; 0.72 cm was significantly longer than the Mayo group with a mean of 3.91 &amp;plusmn; 0.52cm (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;P&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:normal&quot;&gt; &lt; 0.001). In addition, the incidence of dyspareunia was not significantly different between the 2 groups (6.3% vs 15.6%; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;P&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:normal&quot;&gt; = 0.426). Sphincter damage did not occur at all in the EPISCISSORS&amp;ndash;60 group and only 2 cases of grade 3 sphincter rupture occurred in the Mayo group (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;P&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:normal&quot;&gt; = 0.238). The mean of post suturing angle in the EPISCISSORS&amp;ndash;60 group (59.09&amp;deg; &amp;plusmn; 3.47&amp;deg;) was significantly higher than the Mayo group, with a mean of 31.06&amp;deg; &amp;plusmn; 7.21&amp;deg; (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;P&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:normal&quot;&gt; &lt; 0.001).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:13pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-justify:kashida&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-kashida:0%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-autospace:none&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&amp;quot;Times New Roman&amp;quot;,serif&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:italic&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:9.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style:normal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;b&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/b&gt; According to the results of the present study, the use of EPISCISSORS&amp;ndash;60 can be associated with a higher post-suture episiotomy angle compared with Mayo scissors. As a result, both the incidence of OASIS and its long-term side effects, like dyspareunia, were decreased. However, in our study, the incidence of these complications was very rare and not different between the 2 groups.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Normal Delivery, Mayo Scissors, EPISCISSORS–60, Episiotomy, Obstetric anal Sphincter Injuries, Dysparonia</keyword>
	<start_page>471</start_page>
	<end_page>475</end_page>
	<web_url>http://mjiri.iums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-7787-1&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Maryam</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Hajhashemi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>hajhashemy73@yahoo.com</email>
	<code>200319475328460077639</code>
	<orcid>200319475328460077639</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Minoo</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Movahedi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>minoomovahedi@med.mui.ac.ir</email>
	<code>200319475328460077640</code>
	<orcid>200319475328460077640</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Farnaz</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Sattariabro</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>farnaz.sattariabro@yahoo.com</email>
	<code>200319475328460077641</code>
	<orcid>200319475328460077641</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
