Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran (MJIRI)
Iran University of Medical Sciences
Sun, Jul 20, 2025
[Archive]
Volume 39, Issue 1 (1-2025)
Med J Islam Repub Iran 2025 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Eid H A, Kabil A E, Elattar R, Elzomor H M, Abou-Elhassan H, Abd El-Hakim A, et al . Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Therapy on Diaphragmatic Motion in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2025; 39 (1) :691-699
URL: http://mjiri.iums.ac.ir/article-1-9516-en.html
URL: http://mjiri.iums.ac.ir/article-1-9516-en.html
Hoda A. Eid 
, Ahmed E Kabil , Rasha Elattar , Hala M. Elzomor , Hanaa Abou-Elhassan , Ahmed Abd El-Hakim , Mohamed H Rashad , Ahmed Attia , Magdy Taha , Omar Abd Elkhalek , Tamer l. Abo Elyazed , Moaz Atef
, Ahmed E Kabil , Rasha Elattar , Hala M. Elzomor , Hanaa Abou-Elhassan , Ahmed Abd El-Hakim , Mohamed H Rashad , Ahmed Attia , Magdy Taha , Omar Abd Elkhalek , Tamer l. Abo Elyazed , Moaz Atef
Department of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine , Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt , a_ka_81@hotmail.com
Abstract: (25 Views)
Background: Respiratory muscle dysfunction, particularly of the diaphragm, is common after stroke and limits physical performance. Targeted diaphragmatic exercises may enhance respiratory efficiency and recovery. To evaluate the effect of diaphragmatic breathing exercises on diaphragmatic motion and functional performance in patients with chronic hemiplegia.
Methods: In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, 70 chronic hemiplegic patients were randomly assigned to two equal groups (n=35 each): a control group (traditional exercise) and an intervention group (traditional plus diaphragmatic breathing exercises). Over eight weeks, outcomes including diaphragmatic excursion (DE) (assessed via M-mode ultrasonography), six-minute walk distance (6MWD), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) were evaluated. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0. Statistical methods included descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, paired samples t-tests, Chi-square tests, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to compare post-intervention outcomes while adjusting for baseline values. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in baseline characteristics (age, sex, BMI, smoking history) or in baseline assessments of 6MWD, BBS, or mMRC scores (P>0.05). After eight weeks, the intervention group showed significantly greater improvements in functional capacity, balance, dyspnea, and diaphragmatic function (6MWD, BBS, and mMRC scores) compared to the control group (P<0.05). DE improved significantly in the intervention group during tidal (P=0.005), deep (P=0.009), and sniff breathing (P<0.001), while the control group showed a significant change only in tidal excursion (P=0.027). ANCOVA confirmed these findings after baseline adjustment (P<0.05), with moderate to large effect sizes.
Conclusion: Diaphragmatic breathing exercises significantly enhance diaphragmatic movement, physical performance, and quality of life in chronic hemiplegic patients. These findings support incorporating targeted pulmonary rehabilitation in stroke management, with ultrasonography as a valuable non-invasive bedside monitoring tool.
Methods: In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, 70 chronic hemiplegic patients were randomly assigned to two equal groups (n=35 each): a control group (traditional exercise) and an intervention group (traditional plus diaphragmatic breathing exercises). Over eight weeks, outcomes including diaphragmatic excursion (DE) (assessed via M-mode ultrasonography), six-minute walk distance (6MWD), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) were evaluated. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0. Statistical methods included descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, paired samples t-tests, Chi-square tests, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to compare post-intervention outcomes while adjusting for baseline values. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in baseline characteristics (age, sex, BMI, smoking history) or in baseline assessments of 6MWD, BBS, or mMRC scores (P>0.05). After eight weeks, the intervention group showed significantly greater improvements in functional capacity, balance, dyspnea, and diaphragmatic function (6MWD, BBS, and mMRC scores) compared to the control group (P<0.05). DE improved significantly in the intervention group during tidal (P=0.005), deep (P=0.009), and sniff breathing (P<0.001), while the control group showed a significant change only in tidal excursion (P=0.027). ANCOVA confirmed these findings after baseline adjustment (P<0.05), with moderate to large effect sizes.
Conclusion: Diaphragmatic breathing exercises significantly enhance diaphragmatic movement, physical performance, and quality of life in chronic hemiplegic patients. These findings support incorporating targeted pulmonary rehabilitation in stroke management, with ultrasonography as a valuable non-invasive bedside monitoring tool.
Type of Study: Original Research |
Subject:
Physical Medecine& Rehabilitaion
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
