Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Barahman
Comparison of the Pathological Response and Adverse Effects of Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine versus Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in the Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Treatment Approach for Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Randomized Control Trial Study
Aida Cheraghi, Maedeh Barahman, Ramyar Hariri, Alireza Nikoofar, Pedram Fadavi,
Volume 35, Issue 1 (1-2021)
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is one of the main treatment approaches in esophageal cancer treatment, which can improve outcomes of a patient with esophageal cancer. In the current study, we aimed to compare the response rate and side effects of 2 distinctive neoadjuvant chemoradiation protocols.
   Methods: The study was a randomized clinical trial that was performed on 70 patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer in Iran. The study participants were randomly assigned to 1 of our treatment groups. The first group received capecitabine (625 mg/m2/TID) and oxaliplatin (50 mg/m2/weekly), while the second group was given a combination of carboplatin (AUC:2/weekly) and paclitaxel (75mg/m2/weekly). Both groups were given weekly 50.4-54 Gy dose of RT. Chi square and Fisher exact tests have been used for data analysis. All statistical tests were performed using SPSS software Version 22.0 and the significance level was set at 0.05.
   Results: Complete pathological response was detected in 18(51.4%) of patients in group I and 8 (22.8%) in group II (p=0.013). We also observed higher thrombocytopenia in CarTax arm 19 (54.2%) in comparison to CapOX arm 8(22.8%), and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.007). No statistical difference was found regarding neutropenia, fatigue, anorexia, esophagitis, and diarrhea.   
   Conclusion: The CapOxRT regime provides more favorable outcomes and also it is more tolerated by patients.
Cost-benefit Analysis of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Mammography: A Systematic Review
Salar Ghorbani, Aziz Rezapour, Mahmoud Eisavi, Maedeh Barahman, Saeed Bagheri Faradonbeh,
Volume 37, Issue 1 (2-2023)
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is a non-communicable and common disease that accounts for a high percentage of deaths. Early diagnosis of this disease reduces the death rate. Screening methods such as digital mammography can help prevent or identify the disease earlier. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the cost-benefit of breast cancer using digital mammography.
   Methods: This systematic review was conducted based on PRISMA 2020 checklist. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched without any time limitation on June 2022. The quality of the studies was evaluated with the CHEERS checklist. After data extraction, the results were synthesized by thematic content analysis.
   Results: During the search, 3468 records were identified, of which 1061 were duplicates. 2407 titles and abstracts screened in terms of inclusion criteria. Finally, after studying 20 fulltexts, three of them were included in the study. The quality of these articles was scored between 10 and 16. These studies were from Spain, Denmark, and the United States from 2000 to 2019. Two studies showed that digital mammography is not as effective as other screening methods.
   Conclusion: The results of this study showed that digital mammography is not very cost-benefit for the health care system. An increase in its repetition frequency imposes more costs on the health system and doesn’t have more benefits for it.

 
Page 1 from 1