Keyvan Rahmani, Saeed Karimi, Reza Rezayatmand, Ahmad Reza Raeisi,
Volume 35, Issue 1 (1-2021)
Abstract
Background: Despite this seemingly simple definition of value in different perspectives, the definition of value-based procurement for medical devices is still unclear. This study aimed to delineate the definition of value-based procurement for medical devices and its characteristics.
Methods: According to the systematic method for scoping review described by Arksey and O’Malley, we reviewed related literature through target databases (PUBMED, ProQuest, Web of Science, Scopus, and Science Direct) during 2004-2020. The publications that focused on the procurement of medical devices and address the issue of value in procurement were selected. The publications whose full-text was not available and were not in English were excluded. By using data charting tables, selected articles were reviewed and concepts and definitions were extracted
Results: According to the eligibility criteria and reference checking, 24 documents were selected. There are different definition and understanding for value-based procurement (VBP). Identified characteristics of VBP are information, actors Collaboration, patient experience, value analysis team, ability to evaluate alternatives, value proposition, competitive dialogue, and weighing evaluation criteria.
Conclusion: VBP is a framework that guides the review and decision-making to procure medical devices. In this framework, all dimensions of the value equation (outcome/related costs) must be considered and weighted. Health systems need to work on identified aspects.
Keyvan Rahmani, Saeed Karimi, Ahmad Reza Raeisi, Reza Rezayatmand,
Volume 36, Issue 1 (1-2022)
Abstract
Background: Despite the fact that medical equipment is critical for providing good health services and also incurs significant expenditures for the health system, little is known about how to procure it effectively. To date, only a few comparative studies on the procurement framework for medical equipment between nations have been conducted. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine this issue between the leading countries.
Methods: To conduct this comparative study, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, Spain, Italy, Turkey, Thailand, and Iran were selected. Medical devices, medical equipment, procurement, purchasing, and acquisition were keywords considered to search PubMed, ProQuest, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, and Google scholar databases. Also, the websites of the related organizations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Bank, and the Ministry of Health of respective countries were searched for the gray literature. Providing information about the procurement framework and availability of evidence in the English language was considered as the inclusion criteria and the lack of access to full texts, letters, and commentary article designs were the exclusion criteria. The results were summarized and reported using comparative tables.
Results: Most of the countries involved in this study are trying to align procurement activities with national health care priorities. In view of this, there is a trend toward centralized procurement, especially in Italy, Spain, England, Italy, Canada, and Iran. While a range of actors participate in the procurement process, a greater role for physicians and patients is necessary to be defined to meet patient needs. Moving from price-based approaches to value-based approaches is in the agenda to consider a broader range of criteria to achieve value for money and support patient access to innovations.
Conclusion: Most of the countries have reorganized the mechanism of medical equipment procurement. The price of products is the important factor, and recently the value factor has become more important in procurement. Reinforcing the role of decision-making teams and hospital committees in the procurement of medical equipment is suggested. Further studies are needed on the application of value-based approaches to evaluate their effects in hospitals.
