Showing 4 results for Laparotomy
A. Afsharfard, M . Mozaffar, H. Vafaei, A. Kavyani, A. Saberi, M. Zeinalzadeh, M. Sharifi,
Volume 21, Issue 4 (2-2008)
Abstract
Abstract
Background: There are a large number of patients with penetrating abdominal trauma who have normal vital signs and negative abdominal examination when referred to trauma centers. Agreat deal of controversy exists between authorities about screening these patients for emergency explorative laparotomy. Many references have reported more than 90% sensitivity for DPL as a diagnostic method to determine whether intraabdominal injuries were present and emergent laparotomy is indicated or not. This study is for reassignment of this sensitivity according to our own evidence.
Methods: All of the patients with abdominal stab wounds and normal vital signs plus negative abdominal examination who were referred to Shohada-e-Tajrish hospital between March 2004 to December 2005, underwent local wound exploration and those confirmed to have peritoneal penetration, underwent emergency laparotomy. In the operating room and prior to surgery, under general anesthesia, DPL was performed. Then DPL results were compared with laparotomy findings and DPL sensitivity was assigned.
Results: Of the total number of 34 patients, 8 had a positive DPL and positive laparotomy 2 had a positive DPL and negative laparotomy 8 had negative DPL and positive laparotomy, and 16 patients had negative DPL and negative laparotomy.
Conclusion: According to our study, DPL sensitivity is much less than mentioned in trauma texts (approximately 50%). So, it is not a valuable tool to discriminate between operative and conservative approaches in penetrating abdominal trauma. We suggest more sensitive modalities. Laparotomy is the most sensitive approach but at the price of a high negative laparotomy rate.
Nasrin Moghadami-Tabrizi, Maryam Mokhtari-Derakhshanfard, Hormoz Dabir-Ashrafi, Fahime Iravani, Shahram Shams, Babak Dabir-Ashrafi,
Volume 22, Issue 2 (8-2008)
Abstract
Abstract
Bicornuate uterus is class IV and septate uterus is class Vin uterine anomaly classification. Bicornuate uterus is almost always treated by laparotomy and metroplasty. But the treatment of choice for septate uterus is hysteroscopic metroplasty. Bicornuate- septate uterus which is described in this paper is a new class of uterine anomaly(between class IV & V). The advantages of hysteroscopic metroplasty to laparotomy and metroplasty have been proven previously. It is important to know if the uterine anomaly is pure bicornuate or bicornuate-septate. In the latter case, we suggest the first line of operation should be hysteroscopic metroplasty.
Farnad Imani, Ali-Reza Bagheri, Esmat Arvin, Stephen P. Gatt, Arash Sarveazad,
Volume 36, Issue 1 (1-2022)
Abstract
Background: Most patients suffer from moderate to severe pain after elective laparotomy. They often require opioids to alleviate their pain. Opiates invariably induce certain side effects and, occasionally, dependence. Intraoperative infusion of lidocaine and low-dose ketamine reduces postoperative pain and analgesic requirements. This study aims to evaluate the effects of simultaneous infusion of lidocaine and ketamine during open abdominal surgery on the postoperative pain severity and analgesic consumption.
Methods: In this randomized, double-blinded, single-center study that was performed in Iran, 80 patients scheduled for elective open abdominal surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled in two LK and P groups. Group LK (n=40) received lidocaine-ketamine infusion, and group P (n=40) received placebo (normal saline). Both infusions were started thirty minutes after initiation of surgery and were terminated once the surgery was completed. For postoperative pain management, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), including fentanyl and paracetamol, was administered for both groups. All patients were evaluated for pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and total adjunctive analgesic (diclofenac suppository) consumption within the first 24 hours after the surgery. The data were analyzed using SPSS. P values <0.05 were considered significant.
Results: Intraoperative infusion of Lidocaine and Ketamine resulted in desirable postoperative pain control. Patients of LK group demonstrated a significant reduction in the pain score at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after termination of surgery (p<0.001). It also resulted in a decreased requirement for postoperative analgesics, as cumulative analgesic consumption was decreased meaningfully in the patients of LK group (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Intravenous infusion of lidocaine and ketamine during elective open abdominal surgery reduces pain intensity and analgesic requirements in the first 24 hours postoperatively, without major additional side effects.
Zahra Allameh, Soheila Afzali, Mohamadsaleh Jafarpisheh, Minoo Movahedi, Leila Mousavi Seresht,
Volume 36, Issue 1 (1-2022)
Abstract
Background: Due to the high prevalence of uterine fibroids or leiomyomas in women of reproductive age and the many treatment options for myomas, finding the best treatment is a challenge for surgeons. Therefore, this study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of 2 treatment options surgical interventions and uterine artery embolization (UAE) in patients with uterine myoma.
Methods: The present study was a single-blind randomized clinical trial. The study population included all women with uterine myoma. Hence, 80 patients were divided into 2 groups of 40. The first group underwent laparotomy-myomectomy and the second underwent UAE. These patients were evaluated for clinical symptoms, menstrual disorders, estimated blood loss per menstrual cycle, and pain and complication on the 10th day, and at 2, 6, and 12 months after the intervention. The data were analyzed with SPSS software (Version 25) using an independent samples t test, a repeated measure analysis, and a chi-square test.
Results: Ten days, 2, 6, and 12 months after the intervention, there was no significant difference between the 2 approaches in terms of their decreasing effects on per menstrual cycle blood loss (p > 0.05), respectively. After 10 days and 2 months, the pain intensity in the embolization group was higher than laparotomy group (p = 0.045, 0.060), respectively. The pain intensity was also not significantly different between the 2 groups after 6 months and 1 year (p > 0.05), respectively. Also, the frequency of fever was higher in the embolization group (p = 0.745). However, the documented post-procedural complications indicated that hemoglobin level declined post-operation (p > 0.050).
Conclusion: The results showed no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of post-procedural mensuration blood loss or pain intensity and the incidence of menstrual disorders within 1 year. It seems that there is no significant difference between the 2 groups and it may be possible to use the UAE depending on the patient's condition.
