Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the significance of the Q
angle with respect to the patella position. We assess the correlation between the Q angles (calculated by clinical exam) in different positions and CT indices (with more
impression on TTTG).
Method: Atotal number of 68 knee joints of 50 cases entered the study. Clinical
examination was used to measure Q angle (in 3 positions of sitting, standing and
supine). CT scan performed in 2 axial view of proximal tibia, and distal femor for
measurement of Tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance (TTTG) and other CT
indices. Correlation between main variables calculated.and analysed with spss.
Results: Supine Q angle were strongly correlated with standing Q angles and
moderately with sitting Q angle. Sitting Q angle was moderately correlated with
supine and standing Q angle and weakly with PTA. we found no other significant correlation between Q angle and CT indexes.
Discussion: Our findings suggest that Q angle is not a valuable index for predicting
the presence of patelofemoral malalignment.
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |