Volume 19, Issue 3 (11-2005)                   Med J Islam Repub Iran 2005 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

ENSAFDARAN A, EMAMI M, BORGHEI M. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LATERAL APPROACH VERSUS P OSTERIOR APPROACH FOR THE SURGICAL TRE ATMENT OF SUPRACONDYLAR FRACTURES OF THE HUMERUS IN CHILDREN. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2005; 19 (3) :213-217
URL: http://mjiri.iums.ac.ir/article-1-574-en.html
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, I.R. Iran , ensaf@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (4585 Views)
Background: Supracondylar fracture of the humerus is the second most common fracture in children. For most cases closed reduction and percutaneous crossed pinning is recommended. Those patients who had previously undergone an unsuccessful closed reduction trial need open reduction and pin fixation, but the best surgical approach is questionable. Most surgeons apply the technique of posterior or lateral approach. Methods: To compare the results of these two classical techniques, in a prospective study, 40 pure closed noncomplicated supracondylar fractures of the humerus (under 10 years old ), after failure of closed reduction, were randomized into 2 groups, 20 cases in each series, and operated by a single surgeon. The first group was operated by posterior approach. There were 12 boys and 8 girls, with average age of 5 years (range 3-10). Their fractures were reduced and fixed by two crossed pins. The second group was operated by lateral approach. There were 14 boys and 6 girls, with average age of 6 years (range 4-10), whose fractures were reduced and fixed by two lateral pins. Both groups were immobilized in a long arm posterior slab in 80 degrees of elbow flexion. The sutures were removed after 2 weeks, and the pins were removed after 3 weeks and active motion begun. Then after 6 months follow up, the results were determined according to Lagrange - Rigault range of motion. Results: In group 1: 70% (14 patients) were excellent, 20% (4 patients) good, 10% (2 patients) poor results. In group 2: 85% (17 patients) were excellent, 15% (3 patients) good, and no poor or bad results. There was a significant difference between groups 1 and 2 (p<0.05) for post-operation range of motion. There was no deep infection, myositis ossificans or compartment syndrome. Conclusion: The lateral approach appears to provide good long-term functional results.
Full-Text [PDF 282 kb]   (2278 Downloads)    

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.