ALBORZI S, PARSANEZHAD M. RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING ROLLERBALL ABLATION WITH CUTTING LOOP ENDOMETRIAL RESECTION IN THE TREATMENT OF MENORRHAGIA. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2001; 15 (1) :11-16
URL:
http://mjiri.iums.ac.ir/article-1-818-en.html
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Endoscopy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, I.R. Iran. , alborzis@sums.ac.ir
Abstract: (5239 Views)
In order to compare the clinical efficacy, safety, success rate and probable
complications of rollerball ablation with cutting loop endometrial resection in the
treatment of menorrhagia, eighty-three women in reproductive age suffering from
menorrhagia who did not respond to medication were treated in a randomized
study comparing cutting loop endometrial resection with hysteroscopic rollerball
ablation for treatment of menorrhagia between Sep. 1995-Aug. 1999 at Shiraz
University of Medical Sciences' affiliated hospitals.
After at least twelve months of follow up, results indicated that both techniques
significantly reduced menstrual blood flow with no clinically significant
difference between the two groups as reflected by return to normal bleeding or
less (rollerball 95% and endometrial resection 93%). Rate of amenorrhea was
20.5% in rollerball and 25% in the resection group. Rate of post-op amenorrhea,
hypomenorrhea and normal menses was almost similar in both series and the
method of ablation had no influence on success rate. Only five patients (6%) were
considered treatment failures, two from the rollerball and three patients from the
resection group. Four of these required reoperation and one patient became amenorrheic
after starting medication. None of the eighty-three patients experienced
intra- or postoperative complications.
Endometrial ablation by either rollerball or resection methods is therefore a
successful, safe and cost-effective alternative for hysterectomy in the treatment of
intractable menorrhagia.