Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran (MJIRI)
Iran University of Medical Sciences
Thu, Nov 7, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 38, Issue 1 (1-2024)
Med J Islam Repub Iran 2024 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Taghavi Gilani M, Bameshki A, Razavi M, Sadeghzadeh G. Comparison of Dynamic and Static Compliance in Two Ventilation Methods with Tidal Volume of 6 and 10 ml/kg: Randomized Clinical Trial. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2024; 38 (1) :503-507
URL: http://mjiri.iums.ac.ir/article-1-8637-en.html
URL: http://mjiri.iums.ac.ir/article-1-8637-en.html
Lung Disease Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Mashhad University of Medicine Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , razavim@mums.ac.ir
Abstract: (241 Views)
Background: Pulmonary compliance is an important lung factor and is affected by tidal volume. In this study, static and dynamic compliance with tidal volumes of 6 and 10 ml/kg have been evaluated in patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery.
Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 50 patients who were candidate for abdominal cancer surgery. This study was done in patients aged 20-65 years without chronic diseases. After induction of anesthesia, the first group was ventilated with a tidal volume of 10 ml/kg and 8 breaths/minute, and also the second group was ventilated with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg and 14 breaths/minute. From the beginning and every 15 minutes, expiratory tidal volume, peak and plateau airway pressure, heart rate and blood pressure were measured for two hours. The data was analyzed with SPSS v.20 and P < 0.05 was meaningful.
Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups for demographic characteristics. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the dynamic and static compliance of the patients during the study. However, the static compliance decreased in the 6 ml/kg group and increased in the 10 ml/kg group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.32). The peak, plateau pressure and hemodynamic parameters were the same in the two groups.
Conclusion: In general, the static and dynamic compliance was not significantly different in the two groups despite a slight decrease in the 6 ml/kg group and a slight increase in the 10 ml/kg group.
Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 50 patients who were candidate for abdominal cancer surgery. This study was done in patients aged 20-65 years without chronic diseases. After induction of anesthesia, the first group was ventilated with a tidal volume of 10 ml/kg and 8 breaths/minute, and also the second group was ventilated with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg and 14 breaths/minute. From the beginning and every 15 minutes, expiratory tidal volume, peak and plateau airway pressure, heart rate and blood pressure were measured for two hours. The data was analyzed with SPSS v.20 and P < 0.05 was meaningful.
Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups for demographic characteristics. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the dynamic and static compliance of the patients during the study. However, the static compliance decreased in the 6 ml/kg group and increased in the 10 ml/kg group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.32). The peak, plateau pressure and hemodynamic parameters were the same in the two groups.
Conclusion: In general, the static and dynamic compliance was not significantly different in the two groups despite a slight decrease in the 6 ml/kg group and a slight increase in the 10 ml/kg group.
Type of Study: Original Research |
Subject:
Anesthesia
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
