Volume 39, Issue 1 (1-2025)                   Med J Islam Repub Iran 2025 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Gharavi M, Jafari-Naeimi A, Ahmadi S A Y. Effectiveness of Transpalatal Arch (TPA) in Molar Movement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2025; 39 (1) :556-566
URL: http://mjiri.iums.ac.ir/article-1-9556-en.html
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran , ar.jafari@iau.ac.ir
Abstract:   (96 Views)
Background: Molar movement control is a fundamental aspect of orthodontic treatment, particularly in managing anchorage and achieving desired occlusal outcomes. The transpalatal arch (TPA) is a commonly used passive or active appliance designed to provide anchorage reinforcement and facilitate specific molar movements. Despite its widespread application, there is limited consensus regarding its quantitative effectiveness. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the effectiveness of the TPA in molar movement during orthodontic treatment.
   Methods: An extensive search of major electronic databases was conducted up to the year 2023 to identify studies evaluating the application of the TPA in molar movement. Data regarding study design, participant characteristics, types of TPA used, and numerical outcomes related to molar displacement were systematically extracted. For each outcome, point estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were computed to assess pre- and post-treatment changes.
   Results: Fourteen studies underwent detailed qualitative synthesis, with 2 classified as low risk, 7 with some concerns, and 5 as high risk of bias. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled change in mesial movement U6-PTV (mm) for the TPA group was 2.73 (95% CI: 1.90-3.50), vertical movement U6-PP (mm) was 1.24 (95% CI: 0.96-1.52), vertical movement U6-FH (mm) was 1.34 (95% CI: 0.36-2.32), and mesial tipping U6-FH (°) was 2.94 (95% CI: 1.51-4.37).
   Conclusion: This review underscores the TPA's versatility and effectiveness as an anchorage device. Evaluating TPA's full range of applications, beyond comparisons with skeletal devices, is crucial. Future research should incorporate three-dimensional digital models and consider pubertal growth stages for more accurate assessments.
 
Full-Text [PDF 889 kb]   (44 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Review Article | Subject: Meta-analysis

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.